Indian
Tiger, Chinese Tiger - Same Difference
"One mountain cannot accommodate two tigers".
Chinese
saying
"A strong neighbour is a natural enemy".
Indian
saying
Rivalries between India and China, some inherited, some acquired, have been subject of animated discussions and interesting debates in the incestuous circles of academicians, diplomats, defence experts and strategic analysts for eons. Both are large countries grappling with myriad complex domestic and external problems. In the bilateral sphere, their relations are mutually suspicious and often tense. With the exception of border dispute which is a gift of history and may shape their geography, other issues bedeviling their relations are propelled by their rapid economic and military growth, ambitions and prejudices. Both countries have huge population - China with 1.35 billion people is world's most populous and India at 1.24 billion close behind. Their GDP on PPP basis makes China ($ 11.44 trillion) second and India ($ 4.515 trillion) third largest economy in the world. They have their roots in ancient civilizations going back to several thousand years. There are contrasts too. India is a pluralistic functioning democracy. A constitutional republic with a multi-party parliamentary system, active judiciary and vibrant media. On the other hand, China is a single party communist state controlled by NPC (National People's Congress) whose representatives are elected through indirect elections. NPC retains its monopoly on power and maintains strict control over the people. An authoritarian state which does better business than many capitalist countries. While democracy in India works as a pressure valve to cope with social discontent, an autocratic regime has helped China's meteoric rise on the world stage.
However, both countries are plagued by similar socio-economic problems. Have a glance:
Corruption: According to the
Transparency International report (2012), China ranks 80th and India 94th out
of 174 countries on the corruption perception index. It is generally agreed
that China's economic reforms post-1992 opened up more opportunities for corruption
which their leaders are finding difficult to contain No wonder China's former
President Hu Jintao in an official statement in Nov 2012 concluded that "Fighting corruption and implementing
political reforms is the most challenging problem. A failure to deal with
corruption could bring down China's ruling communist party and the state it
controls". These sentiments find their echo in the statement of President Xi Jinping who said in Jan 2013 "We must have the resolution to fight every corrupt phenomenon, punish
every corrupt official and constantly eradicate the soil which breeds
corruption". He also called for cracking down on both tigers (high
level officials) and flies (low level officials). Brave words but will there be
perceptible change on the ground because Chinese government is very good in the
beginning when they investigate someone, but then the cases would disappear in
the system.
The dismal record of investigating agencies in India is even worse. One
corruption scam unfolds after another at regular intervals in this country led,
ironically, by an honest economist who had laid the foundations of India's
economic reforms in 1992 as Finance minister. Read any newspaper, watch any TV
channel corruption is prime news (some mega corruption cases include CWG, 2G
Spectrum and Coalgate). The reputation of its premier investigating agency
probing high-profile corruption cases in India suffered badly after the apex
court in India called it "a
caged parrot speaking in its master's (Govt of India) voice".
Over the years rampant and brazen corruption in India and China has
seeped into every aspects of public life.
Environmental degradation: Great economic achievements
have taken a heavy toll of its environment causing serious pollution of China's
air, soil and water. Atmospheric conditions in China are among the worst in the
world; in terms of both scale and concentration. China has the dubious
distinction of being world's worst polluter and biggest emitter of the
greenhouse gases. Desertification, soil erosion, salinization and loss of
high-quality cultivated land to urban development have reduced the quality of
land resources affecting 25% of the land area. Environmental degradation has
reached alarming levels with 30% of its main rivers and 40% of tested
groundwater found to be severely polluted. Nearly 500 million people lack
access to safe drinking water.
India's
record is equally bleak with massive degradation of forest and agricultural land, loss of bio-diversity and resource depletion (fresh water, minerals, forest,
sand, rocks etc). It is already 5th biggest emitter of greenhouse gases
and according to a World Bank study the annual cost of
environmental degradation in India is over US$ 62 billion equivalent to
5.7% of the country's GDP. A recent data analysis by Centre of
Science and Environment (CSE) states that air pollution is the 5th leading cause of death
in India, with 141 out of 180 cities monitored for studies exceeding the
pollution norms.
Gap between rich and poor: The
robust economic growth of China during last 20 years has never been achieved by
any country in the history but this impressive growth has been unbalanced as
witnessed between the rich cities and impoverished countryside. China has nearly
1.1 million millionaires and 122 billionaires (India has 55 billionaires and
190000 millionaires) and has the fastest growing populations of millionaires.
Between them they also host about 500 million poor people. This growing social
disparity, if not reduced, will threaten their economic stability in coming
years.
Social tensions: China is facing strong
undercurrents of social strains in the rural areas caused by the rampant
tendency of local officials to grab land of farmers, not to mention the continuing
unrest brewing for decades in Tibet and Xinjiang. These are sources of great
worries to the Chinese leadership. India has its own share of serious internal
disturbances in the form of violent activities unleashed by Maoists/Naxalites in
85 districts of 8 states, radical religious groups, insurgents in North east
and Kashmir and cross-border terrorists.
Inflation, unemployment and health
related problems caused by adulterated food-stuff, counterfeit drugs,
contaminated water and polluted air, have added to the misery and wretched
existence of over 1 billion poor, lower-middle class , farmers and
lowly-paid workers living in India and China . The bottom-line is that their
economic success may have elevated them to the high table dominated by
developed countries, yet both are still developing countries occupying very low
ranks on Human Development Index (China at 101 and India at 136 out of 186
countries).
Two different countries, different people, different system of governments yet confronting similar problems. Same difference.
Two different countries, different people, different system of governments yet confronting similar problems. Same difference.
How China and India manage their relationship may determine Asia's future. If they decide to live in harmony it will have a positive impact on nearly 37% of mankind. The unresolved border tangle is the main stumbling block in the improvement of their ties. Despite two agreements "Maintenance of Peace and Tranquility along the LAC (1993)" and "Confidence Building measures in the military field (1996)", the border remains tense. But Chinese are not in a hurry to settle this vexatious issue. They may continue to play cat and mouse game with India, at least for a while, if not indefinitely. No wonder that even after 16 rounds of border talks there has been no breakthrough. There are a host of other problems relating to trade deficit, proposed dams on trans-border rivers, stapled visa etc. Chinese strategy of encircling India with a "string of pearls", and India's "arc of friendship" with South Korea, Vietnam, Thailand and Myanmar exacerbate the situation on both sides. China is unnerved by India's move, in furtherance to its 'Look East' policy, to enhance security and commercial engagements with Japan, and through an editorial (May 2013) in People's Daily (mouthpiece of ruling Chinese Communist party) has warned India to "be wary of petty Japanese burglars". India's belated efforts to upgrade its military and infra-structure capabilities along the 4057 km LAC (Line of Actual Control) is also disconcerting to China. Although China would not like India becoming tool of US and other countries to contain her but relishes a "Higher than Himalayas, deeper than the deepest sea and sweeter than honey" all-weather friendship with India's unfriendly neighbour Pakistan.
Because of their size the two Asian giants
cannot over-power each other and full-scale conventional war between them is impossibility.
So why not go for peace. Having been at the receiving end since 1962, India is the aggrieved party. China with three times higher GDP and military expenditure
than India should be more understanding of India's concerns. Chinese have been promoting
their language and culture by setting up Confucius Institute in several
countries since 2004. They should remember what Confucius said "Do not impose on others what you yourself do
not desire".
In recent years their leaders have been
reiterating that "there is enough
space in the world for the development of both India and China". So
charm offensive may not be missing on either side, but we need statesmen on
both sides of the Himalayas who are capable to see the big picture and take
bold decisions to resolve the disputed claims giving both countries more time
and resources to tackle their pressing domestic problems. Till then,
President Xi Jinping's promise of "Chinese
dream" to his people or India's benign aspiration of becoming a
superpower by 2020 will remain in the realm of fantasy.
A very enlightening and analytical summation. Unfortunately, people do not learn from History. While Europe learnt its lessons after two world wars, which created so much misery rather than solve the disputes/problems, deciding to move in a positive manner by forming Euro Union, China and India and for that matter other countries in the world do not want to learn from their example. There is so much good and plenty for people to share at the same time so much needs to be done, the world should be focusing their efforts in making our lives better and not miserable by such tensions, insurgencies and wars. War has rarely solved a problem. Hope better sense prevails.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIts a nice articles. The blogger's concern over humanity and development of both the countries is appreciable.
DeleteIndeed a well researched article! I was wondering in the background of the LOC violations in Kashmir and related incidents as to what are we achieving by preserving our enmity?
ReplyDeleteFor me it looks like, a well laid out turf awaits us where all of us should get down and play the game in true spirit of sportsmanship, and rejoice in each others success. Instead we are attacking each other needlessly and destroying our very capacity to play.
The rich history and culture across India-Pakistan-China and the tremendous opportunity to do business, vast talent available for R&D activities, and human resources that can be successfully used elsewhere is all going to waste. Perhaps the media can reserve some time/space on their resources and work(through dedicated programmes) towards enlightening the population of the sub-continent to our vast common potential. We can certainly hope for it to act as a catalyst that will, in a not very distant future, make us see reason.
Well-researched and meaningful piece. Why these countries, or any other for that matter find it more useful to waste lives, time and money on this rather than uplifting hungry, homeless and poverty stricken citizens is beyond me! Being a super power is truly a very, very distant dream.
ReplyDeleteAn interesting perspective indeed.Both the Asian giants are caught in a quest for growth leading to similar socio economic challenges due to their large populations and lagging social reforms for equitable distribution of benefits of growth, particularly in China. It is unlikely that they will show high degree of convergence in future due to their natural competetive needs for resources. India needs to maintain a detterent to keep China at bay and this has to be a combination of military, economic and HR development. Our political system is more adaptable and resilient than China but our polity lacks vision and focus, which remains the biggest challenge for India.We need to tackle China from a position of strength while maintaing a state of external calm and internal intensity. Jai Hind!
ReplyDeleteThanks for your very erudite comment on a complex subject.
ReplyDeleteThank you.
ReplyDelete